VHunter
Well-Known Member
I know which is which... BUT do newly trained techs and consumers appreciate the difference?
And why does the industry continue to foster this confusion by labeling their oils/conditioners as "cuticle" oil/conditioner?
When doing enhancements and applying an oil at the end... we are NOT conditioning the cuticle, we just removed the darn thing scraping it off.:|
We are oiling/conditioning the eponychium, surrounding skin, natural nail and/or the enhancements.
We hurt ourselves, as do the companies that produce the products we use by not using the correct terminology.
Granted, this info is not as all important as knowing what exactly MMA is.
BUT... a saying comes to mind: "Begin as you mean to go on".
So why not do it right the first time?????
I know I've asked this before... but I'd really love some answers from the big brands on this. Why 'their' chosen company usese the term 'cuticle' as opposed to "eponychium" or simply "nail and skin" oil/conditioner, etc...
I'd love to know why they foster the ignorance with incorrect terminology.
thanks
And why does the industry continue to foster this confusion by labeling their oils/conditioners as "cuticle" oil/conditioner?
When doing enhancements and applying an oil at the end... we are NOT conditioning the cuticle, we just removed the darn thing scraping it off.:|
We are oiling/conditioning the eponychium, surrounding skin, natural nail and/or the enhancements.
We hurt ourselves, as do the companies that produce the products we use by not using the correct terminology.
Granted, this info is not as all important as knowing what exactly MMA is.
BUT... a saying comes to mind: "Begin as you mean to go on".
So why not do it right the first time?????
I know I've asked this before... but I'd really love some answers from the big brands on this. Why 'their' chosen company usese the term 'cuticle' as opposed to "eponychium" or simply "nail and skin" oil/conditioner, etc...
I'd love to know why they foster the ignorance with incorrect terminology.
thanks