Marian is 100% correct. Ask the general public what they think of having their nails done after that article and they will say 'Hell no! Wayy too dangerous!'. Fortunately, most people have a short term sensationalism memory. After a couple more scare articles over the next few weeks, they will eventually forget this one.
So why print something like this in the first place?
Is it really investigative journalism at its finest? An attempt to right the wrongs of the bad technicians out there? naaa.... its because
freaking people out makes good reading. Think of all the 'plastic surgery goes awry' and all the features about celeb's secret flings, drug use or the always favourite; Celeb Cellulite Caught on Camera!
The public (that includes EVERYONE) is far more interested in a souped up sensationalised story than a DPS spread on 'the very slim chance of nail plate damage in super cheap and crappy nail salons'. If a journalist sent in a tepid story that focused on the reality of the situation, the editor would throw it off the desk saying that it was simply too boring... it wont sell! Find the juice! Find the story! Bigger! Better! Get the dirty laundry!
Keep this in mind the next time you grab a glossy because of the sensationalised stories pasted all over the cover. By buying it, you buy into a perpetual chain of half truths and BS that once a year comes round to bite our industry in the butt. Anyone recall the
Daily Mail article that spawned such controversy a couple years ago? The one that prompted me to write
http://www.salongeek.com/showthread.php?t=12767 ?
Keep this in mind if ever you get into a situation where you are being interviewed for an article/radio/TV piece like this: They want you to think its your time to tell your story, but the reality is, it wont get by the editor without being souped up for prime time and fiction sales better than reality.
Plenty of techs use electric files, wear masks, don't hold level 3 (but are far more skilled than level 3 qualifications) and guess what.... virtually any monomer smells 'chemically' to Joe Public! But that doesn't equate to bad nail services. In fact, there was no definitive solution for Jane Doe to help her identify the good from bad salons so why would she take the gamble at any of them? Articles like this do not help to get MMA banned, they help to freak customers out of nail salon services as a whole.