Apex73
Well-Known Member
The thing about guns is this....
when you 'fire' the stud through the lobe, the lobe fires out something of its own...
something called Blood Microspray.
This, as you'll know from the name is a fine mist of blood & body fluids which is released from the lobe by the force of the ear-stud piercing the lobe, then the microspray coats the gun, the piercer & the surrounding area. :irked:
An ear-stud is blunt compared to a sterile piercing needle, so you wouldnt have the same problem with needle piercing.
The studs are not of the same high quality as carefully engineered body jewellery.
As far as i'm aware, there isnt an ear-gun in existence that can be sterilised by soaking in barbicide or autoclaving.
So basically, when gunning someone, you are unknowingly using a filthy, microspray coated instrument to do it.
Sorry folks, but its true.
I myself would pierce babies ears, but not with the needle..too painful & slow for a baby,
& not with a gun for the reasons above.
*goes off to invent a steriliseable gun*
when you 'fire' the stud through the lobe, the lobe fires out something of its own...
something called Blood Microspray.
This, as you'll know from the name is a fine mist of blood & body fluids which is released from the lobe by the force of the ear-stud piercing the lobe, then the microspray coats the gun, the piercer & the surrounding area. :irked:
An ear-stud is blunt compared to a sterile piercing needle, so you wouldnt have the same problem with needle piercing.
The studs are not of the same high quality as carefully engineered body jewellery.
As far as i'm aware, there isnt an ear-gun in existence that can be sterilised by soaking in barbicide or autoclaving.
So basically, when gunning someone, you are unknowingly using a filthy, microspray coated instrument to do it.
Sorry folks, but its true.
I myself would pierce babies ears, but not with the needle..too painful & slow for a baby,
& not with a gun for the reasons above.
*goes off to invent a steriliseable gun*