Best wrinkle treatment before Botox?

SalonGeek

Help Support SalonGeek:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Have u tried theraderm.... this is the skincare prep for before the skin peel, it does wonders. Or two week miracle cure. Have a look at lifestyle aesthetics website for more information. I have tried both and you do see a difference and my skin was the best it has ever been. If you dont want to go down the botox or electrical route it is an option.
Theraderm Skin Renewal System | Lifestyle Aesthetics
LA 2 Week Miracle | Lifestyle Aesthetics

Theraderm is very good. The distributor is a medical aesthetics company also responsible for Teosyal - a dermal filler. They are medical formula so will be more concentrated. It will not provide the same results as botox though. They will be able to povide details of a clinic providing their products.
 
I know i sound thick here, but i cant find the prices anywhere. Are they on the site or is it me. lol
 
What works fantastically is regular facial massage.It relaxes the muscles,improves blood and lymphatic circulation and drainage,moisturises,exfoliates improves tone and i can honestly say all my clients if they have had regular massages be it body or face have lovely skin.
Also don't smoke and don't sunbathe.
You massage your face for 20 mins each day while watching the tv using sunflower oil out of the cupboard and see how your skin looks after that week.Add some essential oils,particularly frankincense,rose,neroli,ylang ylang and use grapeseed and wheatgerm carrier oil preferably cold pressed and you will have the skin of a new born baby :lol:.
 
Last edited:
If you did your dissertation did you include that the study was undertaken on lab rats (who have different chemical make up neurologically to humans), and that the toxin was NOT pharmaceutical grade - there are numerous different types of botulimum toxin. BOTOX is a trade name and actually NOT the compound used in the study. The dosage was actually 100 x greater than for cosmetic use that was used. The amount and type of toxin used for cosmetic use is totally different and miniscule in comparison.

Botulinum has been used for decades as therapeutic use (not just cosmetic) in the NHS to treat a number of neuro-muscular conditions extremely successfully. Your argument is flawed - as was your dissertation. Submit it to a medical journal and it would not reach print - that I can guarantee. Not being a smarty pants, or quoting my opinion - just medical facts based on valid research. X:smack: (I can do smilees too)!

I take it then, that you beleive the university have got it all wrong too? I mean really????

I've added this research for you perusal You may have missed this in you extensive research...

BOTOX DANGERS

Botox gives more than a frozen face, it can damage your brain

Botox can damage the brain, may spread from face to nervous system.

14 April, 2008
Doing a facelift by injecting the popular wrinkle eraser botulinum neurotoxin type A � commonly known as Botox � can be injurious to the brain. Update: FDA demands black box warnings on Botox, Dysport due to risk of toxin spreading to other parts of the body. (2/05/09)
Botulinum toxin, one of the most poisonous substances in the world, was approved for commercial use in 1989.
Botox injections work by temporarily paralysing facial muscles, reducing the contractions that cause new wrinkles and ironing out existing ones. The botulinum toxin cuts off communication between nerve cells by destroying a protein named SNAP-25. This disruption paralyses the muscles controlled by the nerve cells, and these paralysing properties allow doctors to treat some diseases such as strabismus, or �crossed� eyes.



Recent research, conducted by Italian researchers and published in the latest issue of The Journal of Neuroscience, suggests that the deadly poison in Botox may actually spread from the face to the central nervous system after it is injected into the skin.



When researchers from the Italian National Research Council�s Institute of Neuroscience injected botulinum toxin into the faces of rats, it was found that the drug moved away from the site of the injection, to be detected just days later in the stem cells in the brain. The poison, which was present in the brain of rats even six months later, was also able to travel from one region of the brain to another.

Matteo Caleo, who led the study wrote in The Journal of Neuroscience: �We suspect that this spread is a common occurrence after toxin delivery,� adding that �even minute quantities of botulinum toxin are enough to interfere with nerve signalling elsewhere in the body.�


The latest findings on the hazards of Botox injections come two months after the drug was blamed for 16 deaths in the United States. These deaths are believed to have occurred when Botox, used to treat muscle spasms, travelled from the site of injection to other parts of the body, weakening, in turn, the muscles used for breathing or swallowing.

The results of the new research is likely to be used a as powerful weapon by campaigners who clamour for stricter regulations on Botox, according to independent.co.uk

However, many practitioners who administer Botox injections have questioned the significance of the latest findings.

Being a comparatively new treatment, knowledge of the long-term side-effects of Botox injections are limited, but droopy eyelids and expressionless �frozen faces� are common.


I firmly beleive the knowledge of the longterm side-effects of botox injections are limited....and distinctly remember some smart alecs telling us (many years ago) that sunbeds were perfectly safe. Lets hope for alot of peoples sake (who receive this treatment) that you are not eating humble pie in the future! Luvin your smilees tho! X:Grope:
 
Can I just ask.....cant anything injected into the skin possibly affect the brain? are they suggesting it be incorrectly injected? this can happen.

I will let you know if I look old or die from the botox :lol: I dont want to belittle the argument, but millions or people are having botox on a daily/weekly/yearly basis, and I havent heard of many who have died or been paralysed when the drug has been correctly administered.

I personally saw over the period of two years several hundred people treated possibly even a thousand or more with no adverse effects.

Toothpaste contains a carcinogenic as does shampoo, soap etc etc, so will we get cancer from it? who knows!
 
I take it then, that you beleive the university have got it all wrong too? I mean really????

I've added this research for you perusal You may have missed this in you extensive research...

BOTOX DANGERS

Botox gives more than a frozen face, it can damage your brain

Botox can damage the brain, may spread from face to nervous system.

14 April, 2008
Doing a facelift by injecting the popular wrinkle eraser botulinum neurotoxin type A � commonly known as Botox � can be injurious to the brain. Update: FDA demands black box warnings on Botox, Dysport due to risk of toxin spreading to other parts of the body. (2/05/09)
Botulinum toxin, one of the most poisonous substances in the world, was approved for commercial use in 1989.
Botox injections work by temporarily paralysing facial muscles, reducing the contractions that cause new wrinkles and ironing out existing ones. The botulinum toxin cuts off communication between nerve cells by destroying a protein named SNAP-25. This disruption paralyses the muscles controlled by the nerve cells, and these paralysing properties allow doctors to treat some diseases such as strabismus, or �crossed� eyes.



Recent research, conducted by Italian researchers and published in the latest issue of The Journal of Neuroscience, suggests that the deadly poison in Botox may actually spread from the face to the central nervous system after it is injected into the skin.



When researchers from the Italian National Research Council�s Institute of Neuroscience injected botulinum toxin into the faces of rats, it was found that the drug moved away from the site of the injection, to be detected just days later in the stem cells in the brain. The poison, which was present in the brain of rats even six months later, was also able to travel from one region of the brain to another.

Matteo Caleo, who led the study wrote in The Journal of Neuroscience: �We suspect that this spread is a common occurrence after toxin delivery,� adding that �even minute quantities of botulinum toxin are enough to interfere with nerve signalling elsewhere in the body.�


The latest findings on the hazards of Botox injections come two months after the drug was blamed for 16 deaths in the United States. These deaths are believed to have occurred when Botox, used to treat muscle spasms, travelled from the site of injection to other parts of the body, weakening, in turn, the muscles used for breathing or swallowing.

The results of the new research is likely to be used a as powerful weapon by campaigners who clamour for stricter regulations on Botox, according to independent.co.uk

However, many practitioners who administer Botox injections have questioned the significance of the latest findings.

Being a comparatively new treatment, knowledge of the long-term side-effects of Botox injections are limited, but droopy eyelids and expressionless �frozen faces� are common.

I firmly beleive the knowledge of the longterm side-effects of botox injections are limited....and distinctly remember some smart alecs telling us (many years ago) that sunbeds were perfectly safe. Lets hope for alot of peoples sake (who receive this treatment) that you are not eating humble pie in the future! Luvin your smilees tho! X:Grope:


oh dear, oh dear, oh dear, you really are trying to be a smart arse aren't you - and failing miserably! Have you copied and pasted certain elements - I can't help but wonder - because there are huge chunks of date missing! Those being the reasons the research is flawed - as my previous post!

Are you medically qualified - I doubt it. I AM - and have years of knowledge and experience in this field. Eating humble pie - I don't think so! As a medical qualified registered practitionner accountable for my practice - I only EVER perform SAFE, RESEARCHED treatments. If you are going to make a point for debate it must be accurate, up to date, and present all the facts - something your points are greatly lacking. Cherry picking to suit your argument just makes you look a little, well, all I can say is - lacking in knowledge and not very credible.
 
WTF??? You are obviously trying to be offensive now....which REALLY is NOT proffessional or very nice. Yes I pasted the journal or whatever you want to call it from the web for your perusal, and still truly believe that time will only tell with the long term side effects of botox. You are really going to have to agree to disagree on this one deary! :zzz:
 
WTF??? You are obviously trying to be offensive now....which REALLY is NOT proffessional or very nice. Yes I pasted the journal or whatever you want to call it from the web for your perusal, and still truly believe that time will only tell with the long term side effects of botox. You are really going to have to agree to disagree on this one deary! :zzz:

Pot and Kettle come to mind! Agree to disagree - although I do have medical research on my side! - credible research that is. What I do find really offensive to my practice is inaccuracies caused by flawed arguments. You cannot quote parts of research to suit your cause in a bid to appear clever - which indeed is what you did. I am all for debate, as I have said before, debate is good - I have no time though for inaccurate points of view posed as fact, when actually, they are just that - your opinion - I really could not care less if you like or don't like or wish to have botox - it matters not one jot to me. What I am concerned with is evidenced based practice, - meaning valid medical research. I have all the research for my perusal thanks.

Enough said.
 
I know i sound thick here, but i cant find the prices anywhere. Are they on the site or is it me. lol

Fena, the prices you will not find on their web. They only supply to medical professionals through clinics. They will be able to provide you with details of your nearest clinic/MediSpa though. Hope that helps.
 
YOU beleive you have researched exstensively and that is all! You are a nurse end of... as quoted, universities, doctors etc also have a different view and opinion than you (how very dare they!) AGAIN long term side effects of botox injections are limited and only time will tell with this research AGAIN... Update: FDA demands black box warnings on Botox, Dysport due to risk of toxin spreading to other parts of the body. (2/05/09)

You obviously think your opinion is above such people/bodies...

 
YOU beleive you have researched exstensively and that is all! You are a nurse end of... as quoted, universities, doctors etc also have a different view and opinion than you (how very dare they!) AGAIN long term side effects of botox injections are limited and only time will tell with this research AGAIN... Update: FDA demands black box warnings on Botox, Dysport due to risk of toxin spreading to other parts of the body. (2/05/09)

You obviously think your opinion is above such people/bodies...

Doctors have a different view!?! Really? All those thousands who perform the millions - yes millions - of txs every day! Maybe you should advise them of how dangerous their practice is? I wonder if they know? Even the ones I work with and train - yes train - (as a regional trainer), even to Drs - gosh me only a Nurse and NIP too.

As regards my 'opinion' being above such peoples - no not really - my 'opinion' (researched) is well on a par with my medical colleagues. Again, many inaccuracies on your part. Laughable! I am sure you will wish to continue with this - but really there is not much point. I have no desire to continue with your pointless argument.
 
AAAh! come on now you obviously want to turn this into a slanging match..one I will not enter into

FDA demands black box warnings on Botox, Dysport due to risk of toxin spreading to other parts of the body. (2/05/09)

It's all there in black and white one of MANY links available.

Really pleased you agree to disagree, good girl! x
 
AAAh! come on now you obviously want to turn this into a slanging match..one I will not enter into

FDA demands black box warnings on Botox, Dysport due to risk of toxin spreading to other parts of the body. (2/05/09)

It's all there in black and white one of MANY links available.

Really pleased you agree to disagree, good girl! x

Connor,

You have totally misrepresented the data. What is there in black and white is that vastly large quantities of botulinum toxin injected has the POTENTIAL to spread to other parts of the body. A fact no-one can disagree on. What is also stated is - and I will put this in bold just so you can fully understand (and indeed have already stated earlier in the thread) is that purified botulinum type A toxin (ie botox/dysport/azzalure/xeomin), those intented for COSMETIC USE - IS PERFECTLY SAFE DUE TO THE TYPE OF TOXIN AND THE QUANTITIES INJECTED (MINISCULE). Which is why azzalure, dysport and botox all have license by the MHRA (Medicines Healthcare drugs Regulatory Authority) - and this is important - FOR SAFE COSMETIC USE! This is the statutory authority who licence drugs in the UK - the UK equivalent of the FDA. They also have FDA license.

So when quoting research - it is important to fully and accurately intepret the data and NOT copy and paste certain elements. You have continually defended your views with the same argument - continually failing to acknowledge important points which have been pointed out to you both by myself AND THE RESEARCH YOU HAVE CITED! This is classic scaremongering and inaccurate intepretation. This is not my opinion - as you continually say - this is the facts! It is all there in black and white. We can all cherry pick elements to suit our cause - doesn't make a valid debate.

I am sure you will continue to argue your point to oblivion, that is really up to you.
 
Cherry picking???? I am posting a link, one of many from experts far more qualified than you or I. How on earth can you call that an inaccurate interpretation. You accuse me of editing data, really how offensive??? Its there for all to see and interpret how they feel AGAIN IMPOSSIBLE TO EDIT!!!
The research in the link below is still ongoing and still after MANY years many WORLD RENOWED DOCTORS AND EXPERTS believe as I do, THAT THE LONG TERM EFFECTS OF BOTOX IS LIMITED. That is my point, i repeat, (formed by research from experts far more qualified than you or I)and you simply just dont like it! You are interpreting the research to suit your piont and I dont have a problem with that at all!

You have your point...I have mine...both interpreted from medical research. I do not receive an income from the product.....

If you wish to reply again :zzz: please keep it proffessional and try (altho may be difficult) not to be so offensive x


April 2, 2008

Botox_toxin_brain.jpg
Boston (dbTechno) - A new study, which was published in the April 2 issue of the Journal of Neuroscience, has revealed new details about the dangers of Botox. Researchers have stated that injected botulinum toxin can travel from the face to the brain, causing damage.
Researchers tested the active ingredient in Boxton, botulinum toxin, in rats. They injected the rats in their whisker muscles.
With 72 hours of the injection, researchers found the toxin in the brain of the rats.
The author of the study, Matteo Caleo of the Italian National Research Council’s Institute of Neuroscience stated that this is a great cause for concern.
The researchers stated that the toxin managed to move from one end to the brain to another, breaking down proteins and causing damage.
It started in one hippocampus in the brain, and moved to the opposite side. It was also found that it remained in the brain up to six months after the injection.

The toxin also caused brain cell activity to be disturbed where the Botox injection took place.
Botox is a highly-popular treatment which was originally released back in 1989.
It is an anti-wrinkle treatment which lasts three to four months.
More research will be carried out to try and figure out how the toxin manages to travel through the brain, and how it can be prevented.
 
Cherry picking???? I am posting a link, one of many from experts far more qualified than you or I. How on earth can you call that an inaccurate interpretation. You accuse me of editing data, really how offensive??? Its there for all to see and interpret how they feel AGAIN IMPOSSIBLE TO EDIT!!!
The research in the link below is still ongoing and still after MANY years many WORLD RENOWED DOCTORS AND EXPERTS believe as I do, THAT THE LONG TERM EFFECTS OF BOTOX IS LIMITED. That is my point, i repeat, (formed by research from experts far more qualified than you or I)and you simply just dont like it! You are interpreting the research to suit your piont and I dont have a problem with that at all!

You have your point...I have mine...both interpreted from medical research. I do not receive an income from the product.....

If you wish to reply again :zzz: please keep it proffessional and try (altho may be difficult) not to be so offensive x


April 2, 2008

Botox_toxin_brain.jpg
Boston (dbTechno) - A new study, which was published in the April 2 issue of the Journal of Neuroscience, has revealed new details about the dangers of Botox. Researchers have stated that injected botulinum toxin can travel from the face to the brain, causing damage.
Researchers tested the active ingredient in Boxton, botulinum toxin, in rats. They injected the rats in their whisker muscles.
With 72 hours of the injection, researchers found the toxin in the brain of the rats.
The author of the study, Matteo Caleo of the Italian National Research Council’s Institute of Neuroscience stated that this is a great cause for concern.
The researchers stated that the toxin managed to move from one end to the brain to another, breaking down proteins and causing damage.
It started in one hippocampus in the brain, and moved to the opposite side. It was also found that it remained in the brain up to six months after the injection.

The toxin also caused brain cell activity to be disturbed where the Botox injection took place.
Botox is a highly-popular treatment which was originally released back in 1989.
It is an anti-wrinkle treatment which lasts three to four months.
More research will be carried out to try and figure out how the toxin manages to travel through the brain, and how it can be prevented.

I didn't call the data an accurate intepretation - I called your assessment of the data inaccurate - big difference. It really is not that difficult to understand.

Put it another way - from your viewpoint, how does the research you quote relate to cosmetic use of the type of toxin and the dosage injected? I'll answer for you, just to be completely clear again - it doesn't. It refers to massive qtys (in comparison to cosmetic doseage) of non-pharmaceutical grade toxin (totally different). THIS IS QUITE CLEAR. I really do not get what you cannot grasp with this one!

I can categorically tell you WORLD RENOWNED DRS DO NOT BELIEVE AS YOU DO - WHICH IS WHY THE MHRA HAVE LICENSED SPECIFIC BOTULINUM IN SPECIFIC DOSES FOR COSMETIC USE!

Now me stating the facts does not make me unprofessional. Your inability to accurately intepret the research hardly bodes well for you to call me unprofessional. There is no argument here - really, it is what it is!

As I said before, you seems hell bent on going on and on in a very repetitive way - despite clear facts to the contrary. Believe what you so wish - but it is that - your belief. However flawed. I practice according to Goverment legislation, MHRA licensing, and NMC regulation which actually is in accordance with, and in agreement with, the points I have consistently raised. Which reiterates the point - Drs do not have the belief you do!
 
I didn't call the data an accurate intepretation - I called your assessment of the data inaccurate - big difference. It really is not that difficult to understand.

Put it another way - from your viewpoint, how does the research you quote relate to cosmetic use of the type of toxin and the dosage injected? I'll answer for you, just to be completely clear again - it doesn't. It refers to massive qtys (in comparison to cosmetic doseage) of non-pharmaceutical grade toxin (totally different). THIS IS QUITE CLEAR. I really do not get what you cannot grasp with this one!

I can categorically tell you WORLD RENOWNED DRS DO NOT BELIEVE AS YOU DO - WHICH IS WHY THE MHRA HAVE LICENSED SPECIFIC BOTULINUM IN SPECIFIC DOSES FOR COSMETIC USE!

Now me stating the facts does not make me unprofessional. Your inability to accurately intepret the research hardly bodes well for you to call me unprofessional. There is no argument here - really, it is what it is!

As I said before, you seems hell bent on going on and on in a very repetitive way - despite clear facts to the contrary. Believe what you so wish - but it is that - your belief. However flawed. I practice according to Goverment legislation, MHRA licensing, and NMC regulation which actually is in accordance with, and in agreement with, the points I have consistently raised. Which reiterates the point - Drs do not have the belief you do!



I can categorically tell you WORLD RENOWNED DRS DO NOT BELIEVE AS YOU DO - WHICH IS WHY THE MHRA HAVE LICENSED SPECIFIC BOTULINUM IN SPECIFIC DOSES FOR COSMETIC USE!

Dr. Arnold Klien (to name just one) world renowed dermatologist is not a DR. then...or is that just according to you?


I didn't call the data an accurate intepretation - I called your assessment of the data inaccurate - big difference. It really is not that difficult to understand.

My assessment of the data is inaccurate according to YOU...this is because my opinion is different to yours thats all!

We have different opinions madam that is all. Each opininion is based from medical research and ongoing medical research..available to one and all....you say my research is flawed, then cant you see...if that were the case then so is yours! I really dont grasp why YOU cannot get over the fact that others have different points to make!! Your trying to turn this into a slanging match...why make it so personal? Your point does not offend me..I applaud it... it's a very good point BUT different to mine! FULL STOP!!

You need to come down from your high horse lady.. agree to disagree or like it or lump it!END OF!!! Well I say end of but no doubt you will reply again with some more obnoxious remarks..... and you say I'm repetative????? :zzz:
 
I can categorically tell you WORLD RENOWNED DRS DO NOT BELIEVE AS YOU DO - WHICH IS WHY THE MHRA HAVE LICENSED SPECIFIC BOTULINUM IN SPECIFIC DOSES FOR COSMETIC USE!

Dr. Arnold Klien (to name just one) world renowed dermatologist is not a DR. then...or is that just according to you?


I didn't call the data an accurate intepretation - I called your assessment of the data inaccurate - big difference. It really is not that difficult to understand.

My assessment of the data is inaccurate according to YOU...this is because my opinion is different to yours thats all!

We have different opinions madam that is all. Each opininion is based from medical research and ongoing medical research..available to one and all....you say my research is flawed, then cant you see...if that were the case then so is yours! I really dont grasp why YOU cannot get over the fact that others have different points to make!! Your trying to turn this into a slanging match...why make it so personal? Your point does not offend me..I applaud it... it's a very good point BUT different to mine! FULL STOP!!

You need to come down from your high horse lady.. agree to disagree or like it or lump it!END OF!!! Well I say end of but no doubt you will reply again with some more obnoxious remarks..... and you say I'm repetative????? :zzz:


I think if you look back over the threads, as is clear to see, it is fairly obvious that I am not merely disagreeing based on opinion. It is also evident that your remarks are clearly meant to be inflammatory. At no point, as a medical professional do I inject botulinum toxin in patients simply to make money, regardless - as you clearly imply. Please don't play the innocent party here - expect to be taken to task when making incorrect statements.

Your assessment of the data is inaccurate - not just according to me - but by your own statements which you have written which are clear to see!

I am on no 'high horse' - just concerned with accuracy. Again you have failed to address specific points raised - I repeat

How does your point relate to pharmaceutical grade use botulinum toxin type A?

What dosage does it refer to?

What toxin type botulinum is used?

You see - these points are VERY IMPORTANT, as these points clarify your 'viewpoints' based on your 'understanding' to be inaccurate. However, you persist in ignoring these facts. Again it is not a case of 'coming off my high horse' and 'opinions' .

Paracetamol tabs are extremely toxic (ALL DRUGS ARE A TOXIN), it is about dosage and management. No-one is suggesting taking a whole box of paracetamol is safe - 500mg dose is perfectly safe though!

All the research findings suggest is an analogy such as above. Now I really can't make it any simpler than that.

Dr Arnold Klien, I am sure is a fine upstanding Dr - may even be world class. Doesn't sit on the MHRA panel though does he - hardly equates to ALL DRS WORLDWIDE does it - perhaps you may wish to disagree with the MHRA also.

You have your opinion - which is fine - just don't pass it off as being based on research - it isn't.

This really is becoming rather laughable, I really think this should now be put to bed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Dr Arnold Klien, I am sure is a fine upstanding Dr - may even be world class. Doesn't sit on the MHRA panel though does he - hardly equates to ALL DRS WORLDWIDE does it - perhaps you may wish to disagree with the MHRA also.

Not at all lady... in return...perhaps you may wish to disagree with the FDA?

Botox and Dysport has serious health risks, warns USFDA

Tagged with: botox, cosmetic treatments, dysport, FDA
Friday, May 1, 2009, 20:00 This news item was posted in Legal, health category and has 0 Comments so far.
Botox and Dysport can spread to other parts of body, says FDA and asks for black box warning labels.


Botox and Dysport used y cosmetic surgeons to cure winkles can spread to distant parts of the body and become dangerous.
Botulinum toxin carrying drugs like Botox and Dysport used to remove wrinkes can cause serious challenges by spreading to other parts of the body, warned US FDA.
The US FDA asked the drug makers to carry the strongest warning on the labels of Botox and Dysport.
Dysport, manufactured by Paris-based Ipsen, is the latest antiwrinkle drug containing the paralytic agent botulinum toxin approved by USFDA. The injectable drug Dysport is considered the first low-cost competitor for Allergan’s largest selling antiwrinkle drug Botox.
Botox generated worldwide sales of about $1.3 billion last year according to Allergan.
Botox and Dysport: Health risks, dangers

Soon after approving Dysport, the US FDA said such drugs derived from botulinum toxin must carry “black-box” warning labels explaining that the material has the potential to spread from the injection site to distant parts of the body. This could involve serious risks including difficulties, like problems with swallowing or breathing. (See one of our archived stories on Botox dangers from 2008)
Black-box warning requires a drug to carry a box with bold-face risk information on the label is the strongest safety actions the US FDA can take. Black boxes are usually given for medications known to have serious or life-threatening risks. Antidepressants, for example, carry black boxes warning of the increased danger of suicidal thoughts and actions.
Injectable botulinum toxins are purified forms of the bacterial poison that causes botulism, a paralyzing disease that can be fatal. Botulinum toxin-based drugs temporarily reduce or halt muscle activity.
The maker of Botox and Dysport must also send warning letters to doctors about their risks and to produce a medication guide to be given to patients at the time of injection.
Even though botulinum toxins are safe when administered for approved uses at approved doses, the serious problems had occurred mainly in patients who received overdoses of the drug for unapproved treatments, like limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy.
The FDA had received reports of 180 serious health problems and 16 deaths connected to the injections, revealed Public Citizen, a public advocacy group, which had asked USFDA more substantial warnings, over a year back.
US FDA, in a response letter to Public Citizen, said the agency had identified even more reports of complications, including 225 reports of problems caused by the drug spreading from the injection site to distant parts of the body.
USFDA has approved Botox to treat crossed eyes, eyelid spasms, severe underarm sweating, and cervical dystonia, a neck problem that can cause severe pain and abnormal head position. Botox is also approved to treat frown lines, under the name Botox Cosmetic.
In 2000, USFDA approved a different type of botulinum toxin, Myobloc, to treat cervical dystonia. And most recently, USFDA approved Dysport for frown lines and cervical dystonia.
Medicis Pharmaceutical, a company in Scottsdale, Ariz., is planning to bring Dysport to US market within 60 days.
Allergan has been able to raise the drug’s price annually, as there was no serious competition. But Dysport, which in Europe has been priced lower than Botox, is expected to capture up to 20 percent of the market in US.
Allergan’s shares fell following the FDA alert.
Dysport had sales of $189 million, according to an earnings statement from Ipsen.
wpsf-img.php



You prattle and whitter on as much as you like...I still beleive as many others do, and other Drs, experts etc do that the longtern effect of Botox is still unknown...time will only tell!!!
We disagree with each other you are just going to have to ger over it...TROTT ON!!


Gillianw I LUV you!!! Ha ha ha xxx
 
Nice cup of tea anyone.

Yes please, I'll bring the Jaffa Cakes!

Now, I'm keeping well out of this but to go back to the original post, I am currently in the middle of reading an article in the Guild News about IPL treatments for wrinkles (amongst many other things) and the 'before & after' pic's along with all the garb is an interesting read. I have no experience of this as a treatment but am very interested in getting myself resurfaced so at the risk of setting something off does anyone have any info on this?

Many thanks
 

Latest posts

Back
Top