TBH it is only on this actual site that the term L&P gets used all the time.
Yes we all know that they are all acrylates and liquid and powder is a better and more accurate description of the system....but, trust me, it isn't catching on out there in the big bad world outside of Geekdom, so let's not get so het up about it!!!
Just a very short comment. Why does using electric files on natural nails mean nns? I believe young nails teaches to use on natural nails, and I have seen damage done with a file by hand also, and actually more often. As somebody mentioned it's the tech not the tool.
I'm not being argumentative, honest, although it might seem like it to some... but... if the tech in question was using the correct ratio for their product then there wouldn't really be any need to hold the brush under a lamp would there?
If it's a salon (as opposed to mobile) then they should have an ambient temperature for the comfort of their clients so the product shouldn't need an extra boost of heat for polymerisation.
tbh hun i had no idea that l & p was acrylic, I did my nvq 8 years ago and we covered all three systems gel, silk and acrylic. Acrylic was never reffered to as l & p only acrylic. Yes acrylic is a liquid and powder mix, but i never use this term if i am honest and the way it is discussed on here it makes l & p sound like a different product ( ok call me mad but it does)Well Jenny, I feel a tad sorry that you started the thread on such a happy note and if nothing else you know a thing or two more about the nail industry.
It may or may not be MMA...who knows?
It was L&P or ACRYLIC as it is generally referred to... as you now know and gel is a different method.
Most clients have NO IDEA of the difference and really don't understand that gel and L&P both are a form of acrylic.
You went in as a client with no idea of what to expect and you have learnt a few things about nails in the process I guess?
Carls spot on in his answer in the lamp idea btw x
I'm wondering if by putting the bead under the lamp for a bit he was helping to evaporate excess monomer
(that would indicate incorrect ratio of liquid to powder) and/or trying to speed up the polymerisation time of the bead?!?
Not criticising the enhancements you've had applied (can't because we haven't seen them and neither should we!) although we don't have to agree that the working practice was as it should be in a 'standard salon' or 'high end salon', just trying to help get to the bottom of what you had applied, and I believe (like many others) that it was L+P.
ok. i've read it all...No....Gel requires curing under a UV lamp....L&P air dries
Holding a bead of L&P under a lamp is not the norm....and certainly not required if your bead is the right ratio and if using top end products....which we wouldn't know as there where no labels.
For all you know it could be MMA:!:
Enter your email address to join: