Eyecandy2go
Well-Known Member
As far as I'm aware non medical practitioners CAN administer fillers but not Botox
This is all really interesting and obviously makes gets lots of comments?
Im not sure if all you beauty therapists out there who have commented on this thread are aware of a new BT association the CTIA for BT who want to do or who are doing botox and fillers. I assume, but not sure if its launching at the PB show this weekend? Looks like they've teamed up with BABTAC? You have to meet certain criteria, but they have an inspectorate, accredited training, insurance etc in place and even been to see the Health Minister in London. I thought it was illegal for BT to do these treatments? Obviously not
have you not read the other posts on here? I have gone into detail about what is legal and what is illegal. A beauty therapist cannot direct someone else to give an injection only a medical professional can do this and that is one of the legal aspects. So can beauty therapists/associations be involved and actively teach or accredit? Nope, associations don't have the knowledge to do this and legally bt cannot tell someone else to give an injection. Associations can say yes we like this and we will give you our seal of approval but that means nothing.
You have to look at the legal aspects of this and even with fillers, it's an injection therefore a bt needs to be directed to administer this.
I am a prescribing nurse and have completed an indepth degree module on the legality of POMs i.e. botox, have read the MHRA and DOH guidelines til I can cite them in my sleep. Fillers are a medical device and as such do not have the POM act hanging over them but it's still an injection.
If we were on facebook i would hit the "like" button! Am also a prescribing nurse (not for anything beauty related mind you) who will perhaps venture down this route in the future, but certainly not without thorough training first. Makes me very nervous to hear bt's who think they are able to prescribe and administer botox and fillers without any input from a medical professional just because someone on a very expensive course told them that this was acceptable!
Am also a prescribing nurse (not for anything beauty related mind you) who will perhaps venture down this route in the future, but certainly not without thorough training first.You may want to change the setting as you are currently down as a professional of a lot of beauty treatments. It may save you being asked about nails, tanning and waxing :wink2:
Am also a prescribing nurse (not for anything beauty related mind you) who will perhaps venture down this route in the future, but certainly not without thorough training first. QUOTE]
You may want to change the setting as you are currently down as a professional of a lot of beauty treatments. It may save you being asked about nails, tanning and waxing :wink2:
Thank you, at the moment I am using a fair few strings from my bow! I do actually have training and experience in all of the services i have added to my profile. Not doing anything very serious with them at the moment, but am enjoying providing the treatments when i do!
My role as a nurse (I went to uni after college and still work as a nurse now, mainly to pay the mortgage! and i enjoy it of course) is not beauty related....yet :wink2:
have you not read the other posts on here? I have gone into detail about what is legal and what is illegal. A beauty therapist cannot direct someone else to give an injection only a medical professional can do this and that is one of the legal aspects. So can beauty therapists/associations be involved and actively teach or accredit? Nope, associations don't have the knowledge to do this and legally bt cannot tell someone else to give an injection. Associations can say yes we like this and we will give you our seal of approval but that means nothing.
You have to look at the legal aspects of this and even with fillers, it's an injection therefore a bt needs to be directed to administer this.
I am a prescribing nurse and have completed an indepth degree module on the legality of POMs i.e. botox, have read the MHRA and DOH guidelines til I can cite them in my sleep. Fillers are a medical device and as such do not have the POM act hanging over them but it's still an injection.
As a fellow prescriber I have been saying the exact same thing for the past 18 months on this forum. I don't bother to post on here anymore (with the exception of course), for this very reason - to put it bluntly there are those whom think they know otherwise and totally disregard your professional opinion. If a medical qualification, with a prescribing degree (not gained lightly, as you say)! and a whole heap of medical experience and knowledge is discounted, then whats the point in imparting valuable knowledge - for free I may add! The argument is fruitless - the general public will not accept these MEDICAL treatments, on the whole, from practitioners other than those medically qualified anyway, and rightly so. Beauty therapies and Medical aesthetics are a world apart, only those with little knowledge and a lot of ignorance will argue otherwise.
And before those individuals get on their high horses - Just to clarify, I am not saying one is better than the other. Just completely different qualifications. If those therapists arguing that with training they should be able to offer such treatments - then go to any faculty of health at University and do the graft to gain a medical qualification. Then, and only then, can you even begin to train to offer Medical Cosmetic Treatments, and only after years of experience can you truly be putting the publics (your patients) best interests at heart. Anything less is damn dangerous.
Oh god, I remember the 1990's exams well. In 2004 I decided to open my own salon and to re-sit the exams, as I had been out of the industry for many years. To my horror it had all been watered down and simplified. I can therefore see why some people are concerned about a therapist performing injections. Having said that, I was accepted to do chemical peels up to 70% and I did so much better than the 2 doctors, 1 nurse and 1 chemist. It was quite scarey that they seemed to have no understanding about the importance of aftercare after such proceedures. From the minute I walked in to the training room it was clear I was looked down on until the lessons began and then they realised I knew more and kept up and argued eloquently with anything they said. The trainer let this go on for a while and then put the "professionals" in their place by confirming what we therapist already know, we are not stupid and very capable and in some ways have a better understanding of the clients needs. What I never told them was many years ago I was a dental nurse. It really annoyed me that beauty therapists are not taken seriously. My clients, on the other hand, come to me for advice, one client actually asked if I do smear tests as she felt more comfortable with me than her GP! What does one say to that? All I said was that I have gone as far as I wish in that department. Back to injectables, I would like to to them so will be looking in to training and all my clients are keen.Erm, my beauty exam in the 90's was no picnic, I had to know the origins, actions and insertions of superficial muscles (we were asked to name 4 - so had to know them all) This was mainly for using faradic machines so we knew exactly which muscle we were stimulating, also motor points, a cross section of the skin and to label each layer of skin. my electrolysis exam required me to know the blood system, a cross section of the hair which we had to draw and label also the endocrine system in depth, then the body anatomy which we had to know all muscle groups, and the bones of the bosy and design a series of exercises for each muscle. Plus so much more, like chemistry and physics
Electrolysis - involves sliding a fine needle alongside the hair - IN the skin, but even after all my experience, knowledge and qualifications - I am only good to paint nails, wasted my time then I think.
Like I say, I don't wish to do this - but if I wanted to - I think I should have the option. The people I meet in beauty are intelligent and knowledgable, they chose to do beauty rather than the medical side thats all.
Oh god, I remember the 1990's exams well. In 2004 I decided to open my own salon and to re-sit the exams, as I had been out of the industry for many years. To my horror it had all been watered down and simplified. I can therefore see why some people are concerned about a therapist performing injections. Having said that, I was accepted to do chemical peels up to 70% and I did so much better than the 2 doctors, 1 nurse and 1 chemist. It was quite scarey that they seemed to have no understanding about the importance of aftercare after such proceedures. From the minute I walked in to the training room it was clear I was looked down on until the lessons began and then they realised I knew more and kept up and argued eloquently with anything they said. The trainer let this go on for a while and then put the "professionals" in their place by confirming what we therapist already know, we are not stupid and very capable and in some ways have a better understanding of the clients needs. What I never told them was many years ago I was a dental nurse. It really annoyed me that beauty therapists are not taken seriously. My clients, on the other hand, come to me for advice, one client actually asked if I do smear tests as she felt more comfortable with me than her GP! What does one say to that? All I said was that I have gone as far as I wish in that department. Back to injectables, I would like to to them so will be looking in to training and all my clients are keen.
Really weird!Yet another blatant advert to which you have been reported for before. You clearly have a financial interest in this and are doing everything possible to advertise it against the rules of the site.
If anyone trains with this company they will be trained by someone who legally cannot train you nor will they have the legal knowledge behind the very centre of the topic. No beauty therapist can hold stock, carry stock or prescribe botox which is a prescription only medicine. They cannot legally instruct anyone else to administer an injection.
You cannot come up with a dosage of administration this is done by the prescriber who needs to see the patient face to face!
Since joining SG you have promoted this company which contains incorrect information and actively slates the very same medical professionals that you need to rely on for standard medical and emergency treatment as well as all your prescriptions albeit for personal use or for business. Two words spring to mind here!
All medical professionals are being made aware of this company's thoughts on people who provide prescriptions and I will be surprised if any medical professional will prescribe for anyone who holds your qualifications. Well done for advertising :
- an illegal act
- unfounded defamation of medical proffesions
- your openness to break the law
Really weird!
Enter your email address to join: