What would you have the training provider do in this situation?
I will not issue them with a certificate and arrange for them to come back and have a few more days tuition on the next course...until they reach the standard required.
Referal is great. I agree. It is how it should be. But the reality is that education is all about ££££££ and reaching targets. I have worked on NVQ courses and we are not allowed to refer students. It doesn't matter that they are not competent. Retention and attainment figures have to be reached and the 'unspoken', in ALL the colleges I have worked, is that a student will complete the course even if you have to spoon feed the information to them and be 'creative' with their portfolios.
The basic skills, someone mentioned earlier, maths & english, these are absent from many 16 - 19year olds. These students keep me in a job. But I would prefer to see an increase in these basic skills. I have heard gas lecturers arguing because they have a student who can't read and write properly, they believed this student was dangerous in the industry as it would be difficult for them to correctly read an installation booklet for eg. a boiler. Incorrect installation of something like this can blow a house up. They consider a student like this a health & safety risk. I agree but we are still encourage to find this student competent.
So do we say 'come back when you have basic skills' or do we just accept low level students because we are afraid we will be accused of being discriminatory?
Do we blame educators because they have to follow the rules laid down by management? Or do we blame a society that feels it has to offer inclusiveness to all? IMO we have become a society that is scared to offend.
Congratulations on having the guts to start the thread and chance offending someone.