geeg
Judge Gigi-Honorary Geek
I spent years having enhancements done on my own nails. I've had (from these enhancements) fungal infections, damaged/cut/filed eponychiums, paper thin nails, pain and generally unpleasant experiences. It wasn't until I myself decided to train in enhancements and went to CND that I appreciated how I should NOT have experienced any of the afore mentioned things.
Until licensing is introduced, and "spot checks", it is up to us to make the difference. We need to educate ourselves first, and then we can educate clients. Yes we need to buff the surface of the nail for certain enhancements, but this can cause minimal damage with the right training and experience. Thankfully, when I have overfiled when I was first training, it was on me!!
This is a great thread, but because of the title it will only appeal to those interested in what Doug or Gigi have to say. Change it to something like "Best Linear Holo Glitter" and a few more might sneak a peak xx
Lol, but How right you probably are!
As to licensing and spot checks for skill standards? ... It is never going to happen, we know that. That is why we need better training standards, better trainers, more concern and focus on this issue in traing and ... Products that don't require buffing in the first place (what a novel approach)!!
Licensing has never worked in the States to provide a standard of skill so I doubt it would anywhere else. It is concerned companies along with concerned trainers and mentors and places like Salongeek.com that help people get to a good standard ... And then, only if the technicians are interested in learning.