'chelle
Well-Known Member
I'm annoyed.
I heard on the news that Jamie Oliver had criticised Sainsburys for refusing to take part in a discussion on animal welfare for the programmes that Hugh and Jamie are doing. Then, on the news the next day, they said that Jamie Oliver has made an apology to Sainsbury for what he had said.
So, let me get this right. We are being asked to support the welfare of animals by buying only free range, to the detriment of our budget. This affects some peoples budgets more that others. However, rightly so, animals should not suffer in the name of financial gain.
During the making of the programme, they were trying to find an "insider" to help them with their intensively reared chicken project, but couldnt because those people feared that they would not get a job in the industry again if they appeared on the programme. Hugh criticised these people and said that surely welfare reform was needed, and that people shouldnt be so selfish as to allow the practice to continue just to maintain their jobs (or words to that effect)
Then, Jamie Oliver publically criticises Sainsburys, who, lets face, throw a lot of cash in his direction, so I though "good for him, he's not allowing money to compromise his principles"
The next day, its on the news that he's apologised.
So, we have to compromise our budgets to ensure animal welfare, but Jamies not prepared to put his money where his mouth is and do the same.
I think it stinks. I will still buy free range, but clearly money does speak louder than principles. I've lost respect for Jamie Oliver
I heard on the news that Jamie Oliver had criticised Sainsburys for refusing to take part in a discussion on animal welfare for the programmes that Hugh and Jamie are doing. Then, on the news the next day, they said that Jamie Oliver has made an apology to Sainsbury for what he had said.
So, let me get this right. We are being asked to support the welfare of animals by buying only free range, to the detriment of our budget. This affects some peoples budgets more that others. However, rightly so, animals should not suffer in the name of financial gain.
During the making of the programme, they were trying to find an "insider" to help them with their intensively reared chicken project, but couldnt because those people feared that they would not get a job in the industry again if they appeared on the programme. Hugh criticised these people and said that surely welfare reform was needed, and that people shouldnt be so selfish as to allow the practice to continue just to maintain their jobs (or words to that effect)
Then, Jamie Oliver publically criticises Sainsburys, who, lets face, throw a lot of cash in his direction, so I though "good for him, he's not allowing money to compromise his principles"
The next day, its on the news that he's apologised.
So, we have to compromise our budgets to ensure animal welfare, but Jamies not prepared to put his money where his mouth is and do the same.
I think it stinks. I will still buy free range, but clearly money does speak louder than principles. I've lost respect for Jamie Oliver