Lou x
Well-Known Member
You have absolutely no idea how a salon works then. It is a joint effort between stylist and salon owner to 'get clients in'. A stylist is selling themselves through their services, attitude and ability to build a clientèle. A salon is paying you a wage to do this. By doing a good job on a clients hair, you are selling your services not only to the client but to any potential business that may arrive from you performing that service. This can be sorely comprised if your employed stylist is doing mobile as well.
It is not rocket science.
service + payment= wages
Wages do not exist if the first two actions are not performed and those actions, in my actual living in the real world opinion, are compromised if the stylist has an interest in building their own separate business. Your column, in the salon appointment book, IS your business. It pays your wages, commission and ensures you have a job.
My stylists are more than happy with this arrangement. I let them do their partners hair, in the salon, free of charge (cutting) and chemical services at 50% reduction. They work hard in my salon, to keep their jobs, and I reward them with a good wage, commission and bonuses. I have no objections to them doing close family at home but my girls know if there column is persistently half full and they are not meeting their targets, then they have no job. I am not a charity but a business and my staff thank me for that as it keeps them in employment.
Lol of course I do but my clients are my clients, if they want treatments on the days I am working then they see me at the salon which is fair enough but I wouldn't expect to be TOLD I can't work mobile and think if anyone feels the need to tie staff in a contract so they can't do that and clients must be seen in there salon then it isn't a joint effort as there is no trust.
Salon owners don't like staff trying to get there clients to see them mobile so why should it be different.
Sent from my iPad using SalonGeek