bombini
Well-Known Member
Well that was my intention... I can't change peoples minds for them but just MAYBE we can learn something... even if it's to not judge everyone straight away
Moving forward I'll do the courses that interest me, I intend to work for myself, one of the biggest bonuses to changing my career to this for me, so all I in theory have to please is my insurance company and myself. But based on all I've heard so far if anyone asked me what route into beauty they should take if they wanted to work in a salon I have to say I'd advise them to stay clear of NVQs... what I found before starting and several have confirmed for me then NVQs are not actually the standard to aim for in a lot (not ALL) cases.
But I'd still love to try and see if more of a basis could be found for WHAT the minimum qualification should be... I'm well versed in making arguments in a business case and I'd be happy to write something up - but it would be pointless without constructive suggestions from people from ALL backgrounds in the industry...
I have some ideas of my own but I really wanted other peoples ideas too...
Its interesting you say that you would advise anyone wanting to work in a salon to stay clear of an NVQ as this is precisely what most salon owners require their therapists to have.
This is going to be one of those subjects that people will never agree on. There are pros and cons for long and short courses but the bottom line is that a one day course can not cover the same as a longer college course in just 8 hours. Yes there will be some exceptional people that do pick it up and succeed in business and ensure they continue the learning journey but there will be a hell of a lot more that expect a business in a box to be delivered in with the certificate and then can't understand why they have no paying clients.